Gracia v AG [2002] JRC 126A (08 July 2002)

Gracia v AG [2002] JRC 126A (08 July 2002)

The Magistrate's sentence was not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive given the seriousness and persistence of the offences.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] JRC 126A
Parties
Appellant: Gracia; Respondent: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
08 July 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Drug Offences, False Pretences
Criminal Law Sentencing Drug Offences False Pretences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gracia

Appellant

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court

  1. 1 Whether the Magistrate's sentence was wrong in principle or manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Appropriateness of custodial sentence for obtaining drugs by false pretences and possession of heroin

Ratio Decidendi

The Magistrate's sentence was not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive given the seriousness and persistence of the offences.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • sentence of six months' imprisonment upheld