Gracia v AG [2002] JRC 126A (08 July 2002)
The Magistrate's sentence was not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive given the seriousness and persistence of the offences.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] JRC 126A
- Parties
- Appellant: Gracia; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, False Pretences
Criminal Law Sentencing Drug Offences False Pretences
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Parties
Gracia
Appellant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Magistrate's sentence was wrong in principle or manifestly excessive
- 2 Appropriateness of custodial sentence for obtaining drugs by false pretences and possession of heroin
Ratio Decidendi
The Magistrate's sentence was not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive given the seriousness and persistence of the offences.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- sentence of six months' imprisonment upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment