Gregory v Att. Gen. [1997] JLR 1 (17 January 1997)
- Citation
- [1997] JLR 1
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
More details
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
There is no presumption for sentencing purposes of intent to supply in drug importation cases; intent to supply aggravates the offence; the quantity of drugs imported is relevant in determining whether there was an intention to supply, taking into account all circumstances, including the possibility that a long-term addict may use higher than average amounts.
Court disposition
clarification of sentencing principles
02
Material facts
Parties
Gregory
ApplicantAttorney General
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether intent to supply should be presumed for sentencing purposes in drug importation cases
- 02
Whether quantity of drugs imported is relevant to determining intent to supply
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant contended that intent to supply should not be presumed for sentencing purposes and that personal use could explain importation of larger quantities, especially for long-term addicts.
- Respondent
- Respondent argued that intent to supply aggravates the offence and that the quantity imported is relevant to inferring such intent.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
[1997] JLR 1
No presumption of intent to supply for sentencing purposes in drug importation cases; intent to supply aggravates the offence; quantity of drugs imported is relevant to determining intent to supply.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
There is no presumption for sentencing purposes of intent to supply in drug importation cases; intent to supply aggravates the offence; the quantity of drugs imported is relevant in determining whether there was an intention to supply, taking into account all circumstances, including the possibility that a long-term addict may use higher than average amounts.
Obiter and limits
- Long-term addicts may be capable of using higher than average amounts of drugs, which must be considered when assessing intent to supply.
Court disposition
clarification of sentencing principles
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Gregory v Att. Gen. [1997] JLR 1 (17 January 1997) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1997/JLR970001.html Cite as: [1997] JLR 1 [ New search ] [ Help ] Gregory v Att. Gen. 1997 JLR 1 (17 January 1997) Criminal Law - drugs - importation - sentence-no presumption for sentencing purposes of intent to supply-intent to supply aggravates offence-quantity of drugs imported relevant in determining whether intention to supply, in all circumstances, e.g. long-term addict capable of using higher than average amount of drugs The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1997 JLR 1 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1997/JLR970001.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.