Grimshaw v Ruellan [1976] JJ 299 (15 January 1976)
The court held that the architect's certificate of completion is binding on the employer, making the employer liable to pay the amount certified due, regardless of whether the employer was fully consulted or the amount exceeds expectations.
- Citation
- [1976] JJ 299
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Grimshaw; Defendant: Ruellan
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Certificate of Completion, Binding Nature of Architect's Certificate, Employer Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Grimshaw
Plaintiff
Ruellan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the architect's certificate of completion is binding on the employer even if the employer was not fully consulted before its issue
- 2 Whether the employer is liable to pay the amount certified due even if it exceeds expectations
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the architect's certificate of completion is binding on the employer, making the employer liable to pay the amount certified due, regardless of whether the employer was fully consulted or the amount exceeds expectations.
Court Disposition
judgment for plaintiff
Orders
- Employer liable to pay the amount certified due in the architect's certificate of completion
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment