AG v Grocutt [2005] JRC 068 (23 May 2005)

AG v Grocutt [2005] JRC 068 (23 May 2005)

The court determined that the appropriate starting point for sentencing was 10 years' imprisonment, reduced by 3 years for mitigating factors, resulting in a 7-year sentence and forfeiture of the drugs.

Citation
[2005] JRC 068
Parties
Defendant: Grocutt; Prosecutor: Crown Advocate
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
23 May 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
conviction and sentence
Legal Topics
Drug Importation, Sentencing, Mitigation
Criminal Law Drug Importation Sentencing Mitigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Grocutt

Defendant

Crown Advocate

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 appropriate sentence for importation of heroin
  2. 2 application of sentencing guidelines
  3. 3 consideration of mitigating factors

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the appropriate starting point for sentencing was 10 years' imprisonment, reduced by 3 years for mitigating factors, resulting in a 7-year sentence and forfeiture of the drugs.

Court Disposition

conviction and sentence

Orders

  • 7 years' imprisonment
  • forfeiture and destruction of the drugs