J v H [2004] JRC 081 (05 May 2004)

J v H [2004] JRC 081 (05 May 2004)

The Registrar did not exercise discretion wrongly in attaching conditions precedent to the grant of Decree Absolute, as this promoted resolution of outstanding ancillary disputes and reflected the parties' intention for a clean break. The appeal is dismissed.

Citation
[2004] JRC 081
Parties
Appellant: H; Respondent: J
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
05 May 2004
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Divorce, Decree Absolute, Property Transfer, Ancillary Relief, Costs
Family Law Divorce Decree Absolute Property Transfer Ancillary Relief Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

H

Appellant

J

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Family Registrar erred in attaching conditions precedent to the grant of Decree Absolute
  2. 2 Interpretation of the 2000 Consent Order regarding property transfer and mortgage redemption
  3. 3 Whether the Registrar exercised discretion improperly

Ratio Decidendi

The Registrar did not exercise discretion wrongly in attaching conditions precedent to the grant of Decree Absolute, as this promoted resolution of outstanding ancillary disputes and reflected the parties' intention for a clean break. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs
  • Leave to appeal refused