Haas (nee Daniel) v Duquemin [2002] JLR 27 (17 January 2002)

The court held that the use of a co-owned yard for parking by a co-owner is not subject to the right of veto, as the veto is limited to actions that alter the property or proprietary rights.

Citation: [2002] JLR 27
Parties: Applicant: Haas (nee Daniel); Respondent: Duquemin
Jurisdiction: Jersey
Judgment Date: 17 January 2002
Procedural Posture: Land Law Co Ownership Dispute / Judgment
Outcome: Applicant's claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Co Ownership, Rights of Co Owners, Right of Veto, Use of Property

Land Law Co Ownership Rights of Co Owners Right of Veto Use of Property

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Haas (nee Daniel)

Applicant

Duquemin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Law Co Ownership Dispute / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether a co-owner's right of veto extends to the use of co-owned property for parking

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the use of a co-owned yard for parking by a co-owner is not subject to the right of veto, as the veto is limited to actions that alter the property or proprietary rights.

Court Disposition

Applicant's claim dismissed