H(AG) v H [2008] JLR 44 (18 February 2008)

H(AG) v H [2008] JLR 44 (18 February 2008)

The court must be satisfied on evidence of molestation, the necessity of protection for the applicant, and the requirement for judicial intervention, considering all relevant circumstances. Orders should be finite unless exceptional circumstances exist.

Citation
[2008] JLR 44
Parties
Applicant: H(AG); Respondent: H
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
18 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Family Law / Application for Non Molestation Order
Legal Topics
Domestic Violence, Non Molestation Order
Family Law Domestic Violence Non Molestation Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

H(AG)

Applicant

H

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law / Application for Non Molestation Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to grant or continue a non-molestation order in the context of domestic violence

Ratio Decidendi

The court must be satisfied on evidence of molestation, the necessity of protection for the applicant, and the requirement for judicial intervention, considering all relevant circumstances. Orders should be finite unless exceptional circumstances exist.