Hall v Att. Gen. [2002] JLR_Note 4 (17 December 2001)
Making an abusive remark to a judge amounts to criminal contempt of court.
- Parties
- Applicant: Hall; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court / Judgment
- Outcome
- not specified
- Legal Topics
- Abusive Remark to Judge, Criminal Contempt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Hall
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an abusive remark to a judge constitutes criminal contempt of court
Ratio Decidendi
Making an abusive remark to a judge amounts to criminal contempt of court.
Court Disposition
not specified
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment