AG v Hill [2024] JRC 144 (21 June 2024)

AG v Hill [2024] JRC 144 (21 June 2024)

The seriousness of the fraud, the vulnerability of the victim, and the manipulative conduct of the defendant require a custodial sentence despite mitigation and full repayment.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] JRC 144
Parties
Defendant: Hannah Hill; Prosecution: The Crown; Victim: Victim (unnamed)
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
21 June 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Fraud, Sentencing, Mitigation, Vulnerable Victim
Criminal Law Fraud Sentencing Mitigation Vulnerable Victim

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hannah Hill

Defendant

The Crown

Prosecution

Victim (unnamed)

Victim

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for fraud involving a vulnerable victim
  2. 2 Consideration of mitigation and early guilty plea

Ratio Decidendi

The seriousness of the fraud, the vulnerability of the victim, and the manipulative conduct of the defendant require a custodial sentence despite mitigation and full repayment.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 10 months' imprisonment