AG v Hill [2024] JRC 144 (21 June 2024)
The seriousness of the fraud, the vulnerability of the victim, and the manipulative conduct of the defendant require a custodial sentence despite mitigation and full repayment.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] JRC 144
- Parties
- Defendant: Hannah Hill; Prosecution: The Crown; Victim: Victim (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Fraud, Sentencing, Mitigation, Vulnerable Victim
Criminal Law Fraud Sentencing Mitigation Vulnerable Victim
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Hannah Hill
Defendant
The Crown
Prosecution
Victim (unnamed)
Victim
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for fraud involving a vulnerable victim
- 2 Consideration of mitigation and early guilty plea
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the fraud, the vulnerability of the victim, and the manipulative conduct of the defendant require a custodial sentence despite mitigation and full repayment.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 10 months' imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment