Jersey Judgment

Harman v Higgins [1999] JLR_Note 5a (14 January 1999)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court must consider relevant factors to ensure substituted service is likely to bring proceedings to the respondent's attention.

Court disposition

application for substituted service considered

02

Material facts

Parties

Harman

Applicant

Higgins

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Interlocutory

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

What factors should be considered when granting substituted service of documents?

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant seeks leave for substituted service due to inability to serve respondent by normal means.
Respondent
No argument from respondent is recorded.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    common law

    The court considers various factors when granting substituted service, including the likelihood of the respondent receiving notice.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court must consider relevant factors to ensure substituted service is likely to bring proceedings to the respondent's attention.

Court disposition

application for substituted service considered

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Harman v Higgins [1999] JLR_Note 5a (14 January 1999) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1999/JLR99N005a.html Cite as: [1999] JLR_Note 5a [ New search ] [ Help ] Harman v Higgins 1999 JLR Note 5a (14 January 1999) SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS-substituted service-factors to be considered The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1999 JLR Note 5a BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1999/JLR99N005a.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.