Harrison v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR_Note 47 (26 October 2001)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Evidence / Note
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court considered the propriety of leading questions put to witnesses.
02
Material facts
Parties
Harrison
ApplicantAttorney General
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Evidence / Note
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether leading questions were improperly put to witnesses
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
common law
Leading questions should not be put to witnesses except as permitted by law.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court considered the propriety of leading questions put to witnesses.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Harrison v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR_Note 47 (26 October 2001) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2001/JLR01N047.html Cite as: [2001] JLR_Note 47 [ New search ] [ Help ] Harrison v Att. Gen. 2001 JLR Note 47 (26 October 2001) Evidence-witnesses-leading questions The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2001 JLR Note 47 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2001/JLR01N047.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.