Barrett and Cotterill (trading as D F Barrett) v Hart [1987] JRC 133 (20 August 1987)
Hart was found liable for breach of contract as the evidence demonstrated failure to perform agreed obligations.
- Citation
- [1987] JRC 133
- Parties
- Claimant: Barrett and Cotterill (trading as D F Barrett); Defendant: Hart
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Trading Dispute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Barrett and Cotterill (trading as D F Barrett)
Claimant
Hart
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 whether Hart is liable to Barrett and Cotterill for breach of contract
Ratio Decidendi
Hart was found liable for breach of contract as the evidence demonstrated failure to perform agreed obligations.
Court Disposition
judgment for claimant
Orders
- Hart to pay damages to Barrett and Cotterill
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment