AG -v- Hartley and Others [2010] JRC 065 (26 March 2010)
Exceptional mitigation, genuine remorse, guilty pleas, and positive personal backgrounds justified substituting substantial community service and probation for custodial sentences, with a warning that any breach would result in imprisonment.
- Citation
- [2010] JRC 065
- Parties
- Defendant: Hartley; Defendant: Godel; Defendant: McIntyre; Prosecution: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- non-custodial sentences imposed with community service and probation; compensation orders adjourned
- Legal Topics
- Larceny, Breaking and Entry, Illegal Entry, Sentencing, Community Service, Probation, Compensation Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hartley
Defendant
Godel
Defendant
McIntyre
Defendant
The Crown
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentencing for multiple offences of larceny and related crimes by young first-time offenders with good backgrounds
- 2 Whether exceptional mitigation justifies non-custodial sentences
- 3 Appropriateness of community service and probation as alternatives to imprisonment
Ratio Decidendi
Exceptional mitigation, genuine remorse, guilty pleas, and positive personal backgrounds justified substituting substantial community service and probation for custodial sentences, with a warning that any breach would result in imprisonment.
Court Disposition
non-custodial sentences imposed with community service and probation; compensation orders adjourned
Orders
- Hartley: 384 hours' community service (concurrent), 12 months' probation
- Godel: 348 hours' community service (concurrent)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment