In re Hawksford v [2013] 2 JLR 357 (27 September 2013)
A revocation clause in a will dealing with Belgian assets revokes only previous wills concerning Belgian assets, not wills concerning overseas assets, if the testator's intention is clear.
- Citation
- [2013] 2 JLR 357
- Parties
- Applicant: Hawksford
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Succession/wills / Judgment
- Outcome
- revocation clause interpreted restrictively
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Wills, Interpretation of Revocation Clauses, Testator's Intention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Hawksford
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Succession/wills / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a revocation clause in a will dealing with Belgian assets revokes previous wills concerning overseas assets
Ratio Decidendi
A revocation clause in a will dealing with Belgian assets revokes only previous wills concerning Belgian assets, not wills concerning overseas assets, if the testator's intention is clear.
Court Disposition
revocation clause interpreted restrictively
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment