Hefford v AG [1994] JRC 095 (16 May 1994)
- Citation
- [1994] JRC 095
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Civil / Judgment
More details
- Posture
- Civil / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court determined whether the applicant was entitled to relief against the Attorney General based on the discretionary nature of judicial review.
Court disposition
application dismissed
02
Material facts
Parties
Hefford
ApplicantAttorney General
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to relief against the Attorney General
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Common law
Relief in judicial review proceedings is discretionary.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court determined whether the applicant was entitled to relief against the Attorney General based on the discretionary nature of judicial review.
Court disposition
application dismissed
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Unreported Judgments You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Unreported Judgments >> Hefford v AG [1994] JRC 095 (16 May 1994) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1994/1994_095.html Cite as: [1994] JRC 95, [1994] JRC 095 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] Hefford v AG [1994] JRC 095 (16 May 1994) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [1994] JRC 095 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1994/1994_095.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.