AG v Warren and Others [2009] JRC 166 (19 August 2009)
Paragraph (4) of Article 1 of the 2009 Law requires that defendants charged with customary law offences committed before the commencement of the Law are to be tried by judge sitting with jurats, not by jury; there is no discretion to direct otherwise.
- Citation
- [2009] JRC 166
- Parties
- Applicant: Her Majesty's Attorney General; Respondent: Welsh; Respondent: Warren; Respondent: Other represented defendants
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial Statutory Interpretation Ruling
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Mode of Trial, Retrospective Application, Inchoate Offences, Customary Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty's Attorney General
Applicant
Welsh
Respondent
Warren
Respondent
Other represented defendants
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Statutory Interpretation Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of Article 1 of the Criminal Offences (Jersey) Law 2009 regarding mode of trial for offences committed before commencement
- 2 Whether defendants are entitled to trial by jury or by judge and jurats under the new law
- 3 Retrospective effect of statutory provisions
Ratio Decidendi
Paragraph (4) of Article 1 of the 2009 Law requires that defendants charged with customary law offences committed before the commencement of the Law are to be tried by judge sitting with jurats, not by jury; there is no discretion to direct otherwise.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Trial of defendants to take place before judge sitting with jurats
- Leave to appeal granted on condition that notices of appeal are filed by close of business on Friday 21st August
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment