Hobden v Le Riches Stores Ltd. [1996] JLR_Note 2a (18 November 1996)
The court considered the meaning of 'ordinarily resident' in the context of an application for security for costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: Hobden; Respondent: Le Riches Stores Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- interlocutory decision
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Ordinarily Resident
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Hobden
Applicant
Le Riches Stores Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is 'ordinarily resident' for the purposes of security for costs
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the meaning of 'ordinarily resident' in the context of an application for security for costs.
Court Disposition
interlocutory decision
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment