Holmes -v- Lingard [2016] JRC 198A (31 October 2016)

Holmes -v- Lingard [2016] JRC 198A (31 October 2016)

A stay was refused because the plaintiff was capable of presenting his case without legal representation, the legal issues were not complex, and further delay would risk staleness of evidence. A preliminary issue on settlement was refused because of factual overlap with the main trial, risk of further delay through appeals, and the need for efficient resolution. Directions were given for a single trial of all issues, with further statements of case and a timetable for disclosure and expert evidence.

Citation
[2016] JRC 198A
Parties
Plaintiff: Holmes; Defendant: Lingard; Related Party: Home Farm Developments Limited; Third Party: Bois Bois
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
31 October 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Directions and Stay Application
Outcome
Stay refused; preliminary issue refused; directions given for single trial and case management.
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Judicial Review, Legal Aid, Preliminary Issues, Disclosure, Settlement Agreements
Civil Procedure Stay of Proceedings Judicial Review Legal Aid Preliminary Issues Disclosure Settlement Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Holmes

Plaintiff

Lingard

Defendant

Home Farm Developments Limited

Related Party

Bois Bois

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Directions and Stay Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to grant a stay pending judicial review application regarding legal aid refusal
  2. 2 Whether to order a preliminary issue on settlement or direct a single trial of all issues
  3. 3 Directions for disclosure and case management

Ratio Decidendi

A stay was refused because the plaintiff was capable of presenting his case without legal representation, the legal issues were not complex, and further delay would risk staleness of evidence. A preliminary issue on settlement was refused because of factual overlap with the main trial, risk of further delay through appeals, and the need for efficient resolution. Directions were given for a single trial of all issues, with further statements of case and a timetable for disclosure and expert evidence.

Court Disposition

Stay refused; preliminary issue refused; directions given for single trial and case management.

Orders

  • Plaintiff's application for stay pending judicial review refused.
  • No preliminary issue to be tried; all issues to be determined at a single trial.