Home Farm Development and Others -v- Le Sueur [2014] JRC 241 (04 December 2014)
Although there was a material change of circumstances (adjournment of appeal and new affidavit), these changes were not sufficiently special or unusual to justify increasing the amount of security originally ordered. The discretion to order additional security was exercised against the defendant's request.
- Citation
- [2014] JRC 241
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Home Farm Developments and Others; Defendant: Le Sueur
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Additional Security for Costs / Post Security Order, Pre Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- defendant's application for additional security for costs refused
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Appeals, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Home Farm Developments and Others
Plaintiff
Le Sueur
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Additional Security for Costs / Post Security Order, Pre Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether additional security for costs should be ordered for the appeal
- 2 Whether there has been a material change of circumstances justifying further security
Ratio Decidendi
Although there was a material change of circumstances (adjournment of appeal and new affidavit), these changes were not sufficiently special or unusual to justify increasing the amount of security originally ordered. The discretion to order additional security was exercised against the defendant's request.
Court Disposition
defendant's application for additional security for costs refused
Orders
- defendant to bear its own costs
- plaintiffs' costs in the cause
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment