Home Farm Developments Ltd. v. Le Sueur [2015] 2 JLR_Note 6 (01 September 2015)

Home Farm Developments Ltd. v. Le Sueur [2015] 2 JLR_Note 6 (01 September 2015)

The court considered whether it was appropriate to order security for costs in the context of an appeal, balancing the interests of both parties.

Parties
Applicant: Home Farm Developments Ltd.; Respondent: Le Sueur
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
01 September 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal
Outcome
Security for costs ordered
Legal Topics
Costs, Security for Costs, Appeal Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Home Farm Developments Ltd.

Applicant

Le Sueur

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal

  1. 1 Whether security for costs should be ordered in appeal proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The court considered whether it was appropriate to order security for costs in the context of an appeal, balancing the interests of both parties.

Court Disposition

Security for costs ordered

Orders

  • Applicant to provide security for appeal costs