Jersey Judgment

Hougardy v AG [1994] JRC 169 (22 August 1994)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that the prosecution was properly instituted and the court had jurisdiction over the matter.

Court disposition

application dismissed

02

Material facts

Parties

Hougardy

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant challenged the validity of the prosecution and the jurisdiction of the court.
Respondent
The Attorney General argued that the prosecution was valid and the court had jurisdiction.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey law

    The court must have proper jurisdiction to hear a criminal matter.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that the prosecution was properly instituted and the court had jurisdiction over the matter.

Court disposition

application dismissed

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1994] JRC 169

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Unreported Judgments You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Unreported Judgments >> Hougardy v AG [1994] JRC 169 (22 August 1994) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1994/1994_169.html Cite as: [1994] JRC 169 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] Hougardy v AG [1994] JRC 169 (22 August 1994) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [1994] JRC 169 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1994/1994_169.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.