Hume v Att. Gen. [2006] JLR_Note 36 (15 November 2006)
The court considered the criteria for admitting fresh evidence on appeal in criminal proceedings.
- Parties
- Applicant: Hume; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Fresh Evidence
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Fresh Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Hume
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Fresh Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the criteria for admitting fresh evidence on appeal in criminal proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment