In the matter of P [2010] JRC 075A (20 April 2010)

In the matter of P [2010] JRC 075A (20 April 2010)

The Registrar referred the matter to a higher court due to the wife's lack of confidence in the Family Court, the disproportionate costs relative to potential relief, the impracticality caused by delay, concerns over the wife's capacity to self-represent, and the urgent need to resolve financial provision for the children's welfare.

Citation
[2010] JRC 075A
Parties
Petitioner: Wife; Respondent: Husband
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
20 April 2010
Procedural Posture
Divorce and Ancillary Relief / Pre Final Hearing, Referred by Registrar to Higher Court
Outcome
Referred to higher court for determination; no final orders made by Registrar.
Legal Topics
Divorce, Ancillary Relief, Child Maintenance, Contact Orders, Property Settlement
Family Law Divorce Ancillary Relief Child Maintenance Contact Orders Property Settlement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wife

Petitioner

Husband

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce and Ancillary Relief / Pre Final Hearing, Referred by Registrar to Higher Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Entitlement to ancillary relief including maintenance, lump sum, and property transfer
  2. 2 Contact and residence arrangements for children
  3. 3 Adequacy of financial disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The Registrar referred the matter to a higher court due to the wife's lack of confidence in the Family Court, the disproportionate costs relative to potential relief, the impracticality caused by delay, concerns over the wife's capacity to self-represent, and the urgent need to resolve financial provision for the children's welfare.

Court Disposition

Referred to higher court for determination; no final orders made by Registrar.

Orders

  • Directions for further evidence and case review hearings
  • Requirement for updated supporting evidence from wife