Hyams v English [1981] JLR 89 (17 July 1981)
Appellate courts should not overturn trial court findings of fact based on witness evidence unless convinced the decision is wrong; mere doubt is not enough.
- Citation
- [1981] JLR 89
- Parties
- Appellant: Hyams; Respondent: English
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appellate
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Findings of Fact, Appellate Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Hyams
Appellant
English
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appellate
Legal Issues
- 1 When should an appellate court overturn a trial court's findings of fact based on witness evidence not seen by the appellate court?
Ratio Decidendi
Appellate courts should not overturn trial court findings of fact based on witness evidence unless convinced the decision is wrong; mere doubt is not enough.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment