Jersey Judgment

I v J [2014] 1 JLR_Note 13 (23 January 2014)

Court Procedure Amicus Curiae Appointment Circumstances

Status: Judgment
Jurisdiction: Jersey

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

Holding and result

The court outlined the circumstances under which an amicus curiae may be appointed.

Court disposition

guidance issued

Material facts

Parties

Applicant

Respondent

Questions and positions

Legal issues

circumstances for appointment of amicus curiae

Court’s reasoning

Legal principles

01
Jersey Law Reports

Appointment of amicus curiae is subject to court discretion based on case circumstances.

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court outlined the circumstances under which an amicus curiae may be appointed.

Court disposition

guidance issued

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> I v J [2014] 1 JLR_Note 13 (23 January 2014) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2014/JLR14N113.html Cite as: [2014] 1 JLR_Note 13 [ New search ] [ Help ] I v J 2014 (1) JLR Note 13 (23 January 2014) Courts- amicus curiae -circumstances in which appointed The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2014 (1) JLR Note 13 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2014/JLR14N113.html

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.