I -v- J [2016] JRC 118 (11 July 2016)
On the balance of probabilities, there was a binding agreement between the parties that the Defendant would pay the Plaintiff £50,000 in exchange for the transfer of her share in X Limited, even though she held the share as a nominee. The Defendant has not paid the agreed sum, and is therefore liable to the Plaintiff for £50,000 plus interest from the date of transfer.
- Citation
- [2016] JRC 118
- Parties
- Plaintiff: I; Defendant: J
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Contract Formation, Nominee Shareholding, Unmarried Cohabitation, Enforceability of Oral Agreements, Unjust Enrichment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
I
Plaintiff
J
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a binding agreement for the Defendant to pay the Plaintiff £50,000 for the transfer of her share in X Limited
- 2 Whether the Plaintiff held her share as a nominee or beneficial owner
- 3 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to payment under contract law principles
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, there was a binding agreement between the parties that the Defendant would pay the Plaintiff £50,000 in exchange for the transfer of her share in X Limited, even though she held the share as a nominee. The Defendant has not paid the agreed sum, and is therefore liable to the Plaintiff for £50,000 plus interest from the date of transfer.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Defendant to pay Plaintiff £50,000 plus interest at the Court rate from June 2011 until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment