Jersey Judgment

In re A Trust v [2009] JLR 447 (16 December 2009)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

A voluntary disposition into trust can be set aside for mistake of fact or law if the mistake is so serious that it would be unjust for the donee to retain the property, and the court is satisfied that the settlor/donor would not have entered the transaction but for the mistake; such transactions are voidable, not void ab initio.

Court disposition

Disposition into trust set aside for mistake.

Orders

  • The voluntary disposition into trust is set aside.

02

Material facts

Parties

A Trust

Applicant

Unknown (Donee/Respondent)

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Trust Application / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The settlor/donor made a voluntary disposition into trust under a mistaken belief, and would not have entered the transaction but for that mistake, which if not set aside would result in substantial UK inheritance tax liability.
Respondent
The disposition should not be set aside as the mistake does not meet the threshold of seriousness required, and the transaction should stand.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey trust law, as summarized in this judgment

    A voluntary disposition into trust may be set aside for mistake of fact or law by the settlor/donor if the mistake is so serious that it would be unjust for the donee to retain the property.

  2. 02

    Jersey trust law, as summarized in this judgment

    The court must be satisfied that the settlor/donor would not have entered into the transaction but for the mistake.

  3. 03

    Jersey trust law, as summarized in this judgment

    Such a disposition is voidable, not void ab initio.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

A voluntary disposition into trust can be set aside for mistake of fact or law if the mistake is so serious that it would be unjust for the donee to retain the property, and the court is satisfied that the settlor/donor would not have entered the transaction but for the mistake; such transactions are voidable, not void ab initio.

Obiter and limits

  • A mistaken belief regarding substantial UK inheritance tax liability may be sufficient to justify setting aside a trust disposition.

Court disposition

Disposition into trust set aside for mistake.

  • The voluntary disposition into trust is set aside.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2009] JLR 447

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re A Trust v [2009] JLR 447 (16 December 2009) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2009/JLR090447.html Cite as: [2009] JLR 447 [ New search ] [ Help ] In re A Trust v 2009 JLR 447 (16 December 2009) Trusts-creation-intention of donor-mistake-voluntary disposition into trust (forming entire trust fund) set aside for mistake of fact or law by settlor/donor if so serious that unjust for donee to retain property-court to be satisfied settlor/donor would not have entered transaction "but for" mistake-disposition set aside if mistaken belief would avoid substantial UK inheritance tax-transaction voidable not void ab initio The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2009 JLR 447 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2009/JLR090447.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.