Jersey Judgment

In re Blue Horizon Holidays v [1997] JLR 124 (11 April 1997)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

An appeal to the Court of Appeal is possible from a declaration en desastre by the Royal Court, even though the Bankruptcy (Desastre) (Jersey) Law 1990 does not specifically provide for such an appeal and alternative remedies exist, because the right of appeal is presumed in the absence of statutory exclusion.

Court disposition

appeal permitted

02

Material facts

Parties

Blue Horizon Holidays

Applicant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Bankruptcy / Appeal to Court of Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether an appeal to the Court of Appeal is possible from a declaration en desastre by the Royal Court in the absence of specific appeal provisions in the Bankruptcy (Desastre) (Jersey) Law 1990 and despite the existence of alternative remedies in articles 6(3) and 7.

Party arguments

Applicant
An appeal to the Court of Appeal should be permitted even though the Bankruptcy (Desastre) (Jersey) Law 1990 does not expressly provide for such an appeal and alternative remedies exist.
Respondent
The absence of specific appeal provisions and the existence of alternative remedies in the Law preclude an appeal to the Court of Appeal.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    general principle of statutory interpretation

    In the absence of statutory exclusion, the right of appeal is presumed to exist.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

An appeal to the Court of Appeal is possible from a declaration en desastre by the Royal Court, even though the Bankruptcy (Desastre) (Jersey) Law 1990 does not specifically provide for such an appeal and alternative remedies exist, because the right of appeal is presumed in the absence of statutory exclusion.

Court disposition

appeal permitted

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1997] JLR 124

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re Blue Horizon Holidays v [1997] JLR 124 (11 April 1997) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1997/JLR970124.html Cite as: [1997] JLR 124 [ New search ] [ Help ] In re Blue Horizon Holidays v 1997 JLR 124 (11 April 1997) Bankruptcy - desastre - appeal to Court of Appeal - appeal from declaration en desastre of Royal Court to Court of Appeal possible despite absence of specific appeal provisions in Bankruptcy (Desastre) (Jersey) Law 1990 and existence of alternative remedies in arts. 6(3) and 7, since appeal presumed possible in absence of statutory exclusion The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1997 JLR 124 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1997/JLR970124.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Bankruptcy (Desastre) (Jersey) Law 1990

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.