Jersey Judgment

In re Burby v [2008] JLR_Note 32 (14 August 2008)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court considered the application of time limits in the context of bankruptcy degrèvement.

02

Material facts

Parties

Burby

Applicant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Bankruptcy / Note

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the time limits for degrèvement in bankruptcy proceedings were complied with

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey bankruptcy law

    Time limits in bankruptcy degrèvement proceedings must be observed.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court considered the application of time limits in the context of bankruptcy degrèvement.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re Burby v [2008] JLR_Note 32 (14 August 2008) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2008/JLR08N032.html Cite as: [2008] JLR_Note 32 [ New search ] [ Help ] In re Burby v 2008 JLR Note 32 (14 August 2008) Bankruptcy- degrèvement -time limits The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2008 JLR Note 32 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2008/JLR08N032.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.