In re G v [2012] 1 JLR_Note 14 (12 January 2012)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Family Law / Contact Order
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court considered the conduct of the parents in determining whether to grant a contact order, prioritizing the welfare of the child.
02
Material facts
Parties
G
Applicant03
Procedural history
Posture
Family Law / Contact Order
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
whether a contact order should be made in light of the conduct of the parents
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
family law
The welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in contact order applications.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court considered the conduct of the parents in determining whether to grant a contact order, prioritizing the welfare of the child.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re G v [2012] 1 JLR_Note 14 (12 January 2012) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2012/JLR12N114.html Cite as: [2012] 1 JLR_Note 14 [ New search ] [ Help ] In re G v 2012 (1) JLR Note 14 (12 January 2012) Family Law-children-contact order-conduct of parents The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2012 (1) JLR Note 14 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2012/JLR12N114.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.