Jersey Judgment

In re Gosselin [2016] 1 JLR_Note 6 (04 February 2016)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Judicial review is not generally available if there are adequate alternative remedies.

02

Material facts

Parties

Gosselin

Applicant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Judicial Review / Interlocutory

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether judicial review is available when alternative remedies exist

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey administrative law

    Judicial review may not be granted where adequate alternative remedies exist.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Judicial review is not generally available if there are adequate alternative remedies.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re Gosselin [2016] 1 JLR_Note 6 (04 February 2016) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2016/JLR16N106.html Cite as: [2016] 1 JLR_Note 6 [ New search ] [ Help ] In re Gosselin 2016 (1) JLR Note 6 (04 February 2016) Administrative Law-judicial review-alternative remedies The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2016 (1) JLR Note 6 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2016/JLR16N106.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.