In re Internine Trust v [2005] JLR 236 (27 May 2005)
- Citation
- [2005] JLR 236
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Trust Application / Judgment
More details
- Posture
- Trust Application / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The protector's power to amend the trust deed is fiduciary in nature and must be exercised bona fide, for a proper purpose, and in the interests of the beneficiaries; radical amendments increasing the protector's power require greater justification.
Court disposition
Application allowed in part
Orders
- Protector's power to amend must be exercised bona fide, for proper purpose, and in the interests of beneficiaries
- Radical amendments increasing protector's power require greater justification
- Amendment of administrative provisions permissible if no increase in financial burdens or reduction of beneficial entitlements
02
Material facts
Parties
Internine Trust
ApplicantUnknown Respondent
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Trust Application / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the trust protector's power to amend the trust deed must be exercised bona fide, for a proper purpose, and in the interests of beneficiaries
- 02
Whether radical amendments increasing the protector's power require greater justification
- 03
Whether amendment of administrative provisions is permissible if it does not increase financial burdens or reduce beneficial entitlements
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The protector's power to amend the trust deed should be exercised in accordance with fiduciary duties and not for personal benefit.
- Respondent
- Radical amendments increasing the protector's power require greater justification and must not adversely affect beneficiaries.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
[2005] JLR 236
The protector's position is fiduciary, even if the protector is also a beneficiary, and powers must be exercised bona fide, for proper purpose, and in the interests of beneficiaries.
- 02
[2005] JLR 236
Radical amendments increasing the protector's power require greater justification.
- 03
[2005] JLR 236
Amendment of administrative provisions is not beyond the contemplation of the maker if there is no increase in financial burdens or reduction of beneficial entitlements.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The protector's power to amend the trust deed is fiduciary in nature and must be exercised bona fide, for a proper purpose, and in the interests of the beneficiaries; radical amendments increasing the protector's power require greater justification.
Court disposition
Application allowed in part
- Protector's power to amend must be exercised bona fide, for proper purpose, and in the interests of beneficiaries
- Radical amendments increasing protector's power require greater justification
- Amendment of administrative provisions permissible if no increase in financial burdens or reduction of beneficial entitlements
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re Internine Trust v [2005] JLR 236 (27 May 2005) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR050236.html Cite as: [2005] JLR 236 [ New search ] [ Help ] In re Internine Trust v 2005 JLR 236 (27 May 2005) Trusts-trust protector-powers and duties-power to amend-to be exercised bona fide, for proper purpose and in interests of beneficiaries because protector's position is fiduciary, even if also beneficiary-radical amendments increasing protector's power require greater justification-amendment of administrative provisions not beyond contemplation of maker if no increase in financial burdens or reduction of beneficial entitlements The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2005 JLR 236 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR050236.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.