Jersey Judgment

In re Internine Trust v [2005] JLR 236 (27 May 2005)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The protector's power to amend the trust deed is fiduciary in nature and must be exercised bona fide, for a proper purpose, and in the interests of the beneficiaries; radical amendments increasing the protector's power require greater justification.

Court disposition

Application allowed in part

Orders

  • Protector's power to amend must be exercised bona fide, for proper purpose, and in the interests of beneficiaries
  • Radical amendments increasing protector's power require greater justification
  • Amendment of administrative provisions permissible if no increase in financial burdens or reduction of beneficial entitlements

02

Material facts

Parties

Internine Trust

Applicant

Unknown Respondent

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Trust Application / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The protector's power to amend the trust deed should be exercised in accordance with fiduciary duties and not for personal benefit.
Respondent
Radical amendments increasing the protector's power require greater justification and must not adversely affect beneficiaries.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    [2005] JLR 236

    The protector's position is fiduciary, even if the protector is also a beneficiary, and powers must be exercised bona fide, for proper purpose, and in the interests of beneficiaries.

  2. 02

    [2005] JLR 236

    Radical amendments increasing the protector's power require greater justification.

  3. 03

    [2005] JLR 236

    Amendment of administrative provisions is not beyond the contemplation of the maker if there is no increase in financial burdens or reduction of beneficial entitlements.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The protector's power to amend the trust deed is fiduciary in nature and must be exercised bona fide, for a proper purpose, and in the interests of the beneficiaries; radical amendments increasing the protector's power require greater justification.

Court disposition

Application allowed in part

  • Protector's power to amend must be exercised bona fide, for proper purpose, and in the interests of beneficiaries
  • Radical amendments increasing protector's power require greater justification
  • Amendment of administrative provisions permissible if no increase in financial burdens or reduction of beneficial entitlements

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2005] JLR 236

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re Internine Trust v [2005] JLR 236 (27 May 2005) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR050236.html Cite as: [2005] JLR 236 [ New search ] [ Help ] In re Internine Trust v 2005 JLR 236 (27 May 2005) Trusts-trust protector-powers and duties-power to amend-to be exercised bona fide, for proper purpose and in interests of beneficiaries because protector's position is fiduciary, even if also beneficiary-radical amendments increasing protector's power require greater justification-amendment of administrative provisions not beyond contemplation of maker if no increase in financial burdens or reduction of beneficial entitlements The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2005 JLR 236 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR050236.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

[2005] JLR 236

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.