Jersey Judgment

In re Madge's Settlement v [1994] JLR_Note 16b (17 May 1994)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that the burden of proof for rectification rests with the applicant, who must demonstrate on the balance of probabilities that the instrument fails to reflect the true intention due to a mistake.

Court disposition

Application for rectification considered; burden of proof clarified.

02

Material facts

Parties

In re Madge's Settlement

Applicant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Rectification / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

What is the burden of proof required for rectification of a trust instrument?

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant seeks rectification of the trust instrument, contending that the document does not reflect the true intention of the settlor due to a mistake.
Respondent
The respondent challenges the application, arguing that the burden of proof for rectification has not been met.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey law on rectification

    The burden of proof in applications for rectification lies on the party seeking rectification to establish that the instrument does not reflect the true intention due to a mistake.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that the burden of proof for rectification rests with the applicant, who must demonstrate on the balance of probabilities that the instrument fails to reflect the true intention due to a mistake.

Court disposition

Application for rectification considered; burden of proof clarified.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re Madge's Settlement v [1994] JLR_Note 16b (17 May 1994) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1994/JLR94N016b.html Cite as: [1994] JLR_Note 16b [ New search ] [ Help ] In re Madge's Settlement v 1994 JLR Note 16b (17 May 1994) RECTIFICATION-burden of proof The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1994 JLR Note 16b BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1994/JLR94N016b.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.