In re Phillips v [2009] JLR_Note 21 (24 April 2009)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Succession Wills Rectification / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court considered whether the will should be rectified to reflect the true intentions of the testator.
02
Material facts
Parties
Phillips
Applicant03
Procedural history
Posture
Succession Wills Rectification / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the will should be rectified
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Jersey Succession Law
Rectification of wills is permissible where the will does not carry out the testator's intentions due to clerical error or misunderstanding.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court considered whether the will should be rectified to reflect the true intentions of the testator.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re Phillips v [2009] JLR_Note 21 (24 April 2009) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2009/JLR09N021.html Cite as: [2009] JLR_Note 21 [ New search ] [ Help ] In re Phillips v 2009 JLR Note 21 (24 April 2009) Succession-wills-rectification The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2009 JLR Note 21 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2009/JLR09N021.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.