Jersey Judgment

In re Samvardhana v [2014] 2 JLR 11 (04 June 2014)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

An offer of twice the net asset value of the company, pro rata to shareholdings, is 'fair and reasonable' under the law if accepted by a large number of shareholders and the company's independent directors; an offer is only unfair if it is obviously and patently unfair, not merely imperfect.

Court disposition

Offer held fair and reasonable

02

Material facts

Parties

Samvardhana

Applicant

Amounts and remedies

  • Offer as Multiple of Net Asset Value: 2

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Company Law Takeover Offer / Judgment on Fairness of Takeover Offer

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the takeover offer is 'fair and reasonable' under Companies (Jersey) Law 1991, art. 121(5)(c)

Party arguments

Applicant
The offer, being twice the net asset value of the company pro rata to shareholdings, is fair and reasonable, especially as it is accepted by a large number of shareholders and the company's independent directors.
Respondent
An offer is only unfair if it is obviously and patently unfair, not merely imperfect.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Companies (Jersey) Law 1991, art. 121(5)(c)

    Fairness of a takeover offer depends on the circumstances of the individual case; an offer is fair and reasonable if accepted by a large number of shareholders and independent directors, and is only unfair if obviously and patently unfair, not merely imperfect.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

An offer of twice the net asset value of the company, pro rata to shareholdings, is 'fair and reasonable' under the law if accepted by a large number of shareholders and the company's independent directors; an offer is only unfair if it is obviously and patently unfair, not merely imperfect.

Court disposition

Offer held fair and reasonable

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2014] 2 JLR 11

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re Samvardhana v [2014] 2 JLR 11 (04 June 2014) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2014/JLR142011.html Cite as: [2014] 2 JLR 11 [ New search ] [ Help ] In re Samvardhana v 2014 (2) JLR 11 (04 June 2014) Companies-takeovers-takeover offers-fair and reasonable-fairness of offer depends on circumstances of individual case-offer of twice net asset value of company (pro rata to shareholdings) "fair and reasonable," as required by Companies (Jersey) Law 1991, art. 121(5)(c), if accepted by large number of shareholders and company's independent directors-offer unfair if obviously and patently unfair, not merely imperfect The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2014 (2) JLR 11 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2014/JLR142011.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Companies (Jersey) Law 1991, art. 121(5)(c)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.