Jersey Judgment

In re X Trust v [2012] 2 JLR 260 (01 October 2012)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court may order beneficiaries' costs of a derivative action against trustees for breach of trust to be paid from the trust fund if the action is well founded, there is no alternative funding, and the prospects of success or risk of failure effectively fall on the beneficiaries.

Court disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Beneficiaries' costs of the derivative action to be paid from the trust fund if in the best interests of the trust.

02

Material facts

Parties

Beneficiaries of X Trust

Applicant

Trustees of X Trust

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Trusts Derivative Action / Costs Application

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the court may order beneficiaries' costs of a derivative action against trustees for breach of trust to be paid from the trust fund

Party arguments

Applicant
Beneficiaries seek payment of their costs from the trust fund for bringing a derivative action against trustees for breach of trust, arguing it is in the best interests of the trust.
Respondent
Trustees oppose payment of beneficiaries' costs from the trust fund.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    In re X Trust v [2012] 2 JLR 260

    The court, in exercise of its inherent supervisory jurisdiction, may order beneficiaries' costs of a derivative action against trustees for breach of trust to be paid from the trust fund if it is in the best interests of the trust.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court may order beneficiaries' costs of a derivative action against trustees for breach of trust to be paid from the trust fund if the action is well founded, there is no alternative funding, and the prospects of success or risk of failure effectively fall on the beneficiaries.

Obiter and limits

  • Such an order is appropriate, for example, if the action is well founded, there is no alternative funding, and the prospects of success or risk of failure effectively fall on the beneficiaries.

Court disposition

Application granted

  • Beneficiaries' costs of the derivative action to be paid from the trust fund if in the best interests of the trust.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2012] 2 JLR 260

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re X Trust v [2012] 2 JLR 260 (01 October 2012) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2012/JLR122260.html Cite as: [2012] 2 JLR 260 [ New search ] [ Help ] In re X Trust v 2012 (2) JLR 260 (01 October 2012) Trusts-legal proceedings-derivative action by beneficiaries-in exercise of inherent supervisory jurisdiction, court may order beneficiaries' costs of derivative action against trustees for breach of trust to be paid from trust fund if in best interests of trust-e.g. if action well founded; no alternative funding; and prospect of success/risk of failure effectively on beneficiaries The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2012 (2) JLR 260 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2012/JLR122260.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

In re X Trust v [2012] 2 JLR 260

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.