In re X Trust v [2012] 2 JLR 260 (01 October 2012)
- Citation
- [2012] 2 JLR 260
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Trusts Derivative Action / Costs Application
More details
- Posture
- Trusts Derivative Action / Costs Application
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court may order beneficiaries' costs of a derivative action against trustees for breach of trust to be paid from the trust fund if the action is well founded, there is no alternative funding, and the prospects of success or risk of failure effectively fall on the beneficiaries.
Court disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Beneficiaries' costs of the derivative action to be paid from the trust fund if in the best interests of the trust.
02
Material facts
Parties
Beneficiaries of X Trust
ApplicantTrustees of X Trust
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Trusts Derivative Action / Costs Application
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the court may order beneficiaries' costs of a derivative action against trustees for breach of trust to be paid from the trust fund
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Beneficiaries seek payment of their costs from the trust fund for bringing a derivative action against trustees for breach of trust, arguing it is in the best interests of the trust.
- Respondent
- Trustees oppose payment of beneficiaries' costs from the trust fund.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
In re X Trust v [2012] 2 JLR 260
The court, in exercise of its inherent supervisory jurisdiction, may order beneficiaries' costs of a derivative action against trustees for breach of trust to be paid from the trust fund if it is in the best interests of the trust.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court may order beneficiaries' costs of a derivative action against trustees for breach of trust to be paid from the trust fund if the action is well founded, there is no alternative funding, and the prospects of success or risk of failure effectively fall on the beneficiaries.
Obiter and limits
- Such an order is appropriate, for example, if the action is well founded, there is no alternative funding, and the prospects of success or risk of failure effectively fall on the beneficiaries.
Court disposition
Application granted
- Beneficiaries' costs of the derivative action to be paid from the trust fund if in the best interests of the trust.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> In re X Trust v [2012] 2 JLR 260 (01 October 2012) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2012/JLR122260.html Cite as: [2012] 2 JLR 260 [ New search ] [ Help ] In re X Trust v 2012 (2) JLR 260 (01 October 2012) Trusts-legal proceedings-derivative action by beneficiaries-in exercise of inherent supervisory jurisdiction, court may order beneficiaries' costs of derivative action against trustees for breach of trust to be paid from trust fund if in best interests of trust-e.g. if action well founded; no alternative funding; and prospect of success/risk of failure effectively on beneficiaries The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2012 (2) JLR 260 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2012/JLR122260.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.