Incat v Luba Freeport [2010] JLR 287 (30 April 2010)

Incat v Luba Freeport [2010] JLR 287 (30 April 2010)

No valid contract to discontinue proceedings existed because there was no sufficient meeting of minds; the language of negotiations was conditional.

Citation
[2010] JLR 287
Parties
Applicant: Incat; Respondent: Luba Freeport
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
30 April 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Elements of Valid Contract, Consent, Capacity, Objet, Cause, Volonte, Nullity, Meeting of Minds
Contract Law Elements of Valid Contract Consent Capacity Objet Cause Volonte Nullity +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Incat

Applicant

Luba Freeport

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What are the elements of a valid contract under Jersey law?
  2. 2 Was there a valid contract to discontinue proceedings between the parties?

Ratio Decidendi

No valid contract to discontinue proceedings existed because there was no sufficient meeting of minds; the language of negotiations was conditional.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed