Jaiswal v Jaiswal [2007] JLR 69 (13 February 2007)
Jersey will not stay proceedings if a stay would cause significant delay and risk of prejudice, even if another jurisdiction is otherwise the forum conveniens for determining the validity of a will.
- Citation
- [2007] JLR 69
- Parties
- Applicant: Jaiswal; Respondent: Jaiswal
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Wills / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- application for stay refused
- Legal Topics
- Forum Conveniens, Validity of Wills, Foreign Domiciliary
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Jaiswal
Applicant
Jaiswal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Wills / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Which jurisdiction is the forum conveniens for determination of the validity of a will of a foreign domiciliary?
- 2 Whether Jersey proceedings should be stayed in favour of proceedings in another jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi
Jersey will not stay proceedings if a stay would cause significant delay and risk of prejudice, even if another jurisdiction is otherwise the forum conveniens for determining the validity of a will.
Court Disposition
application for stay refused
Orders
- Jersey proceedings to continue
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment