Jersey Judgment

Janvrin Holdings Ltd. v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR 637 (26 October 2001)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Demolition of a building does not per se constitute 'development' under the Island Planning (Jersey) Law 1946, art. 5(2)(a); the statute is penal in nature and unclear, thus must be construed narrowly.

Court disposition

appeal allowed

02

Material facts

Parties

Janvrin Holdings Ltd.

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Appellate

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether demolition of a building constitutes 'development' under Island Planning (Jersey) Law 1946, art. 5(2)(a)

Party arguments

Applicant
Demolition is not per se 'development' and should not be treated as such merely because it causes a substantial change or physical effect on land.
Respondent
Demolition constitutes 'development' due to its substantial change or physical effect on the land.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Island Planning (Jersey) Law 1946, art. 5(2)(a)

    Penal statutes must be construed narrowly when unclear.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Demolition of a building does not per se constitute 'development' under the Island Planning (Jersey) Law 1946, art. 5(2)(a); the statute is penal in nature and unclear, thus must be construed narrowly.

Court disposition

appeal allowed

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2001] JLR 637

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Janvrin Holdings Ltd. v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR 637 (26 October 2001) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2001/JLR010637.html Cite as: [2001] JLR 637 [ New search ] [ Help ] Janvrin Holdings Ltd. v Att. Gen. 2001 JLR 637 (26 October 2001) Planning Law-development-demolition-demolition of building not per se "development"-work does not cease to be development because includes demolition-substantial change or physical effect on land caused by demolition insufficient to constitute development-Island Planning (Jersey) Law 1946, art. 5(2)(a) to be construed narrowly as penal in nature and unclear The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2001 JLR 637 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2001/JLR010637.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Island Planning (Jersey) Law 1946, art. 5(2)(a)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.