In the matter of the S Bar [2013] JRC 197 (10 October 2013)

In the matter of the S Bar [2013] JRC 197 (10 October 2013)

The premises were not suitable for the conduct of business as required by Article 6(9) of the Licensing (Jersey) Law 1974 due to safety concerns for pedestrians and the impact on traffic, and therefore the application for extension of the liquor licence was refused.

Citation
[2013] JRC 197
Parties
Applicant: Jeppeto Limited; Objector: Gino Risoli
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
10 October 2013
Procedural Posture
Licensing Application / Decision on Ex Parte Application
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Extension of Liquor Licence, Public Safety, Use of Public Land, Suitability of Premises
Licensing Law Administrative Law Extension of Liquor Licence Public Safety Use of Public Land Suitability of Premises

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jeppeto Limited

Applicant

Gino Risoli

Objector

Procedural Posture

Licensing Application / Decision on Ex Parte Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the extension of the liquor licence to the pavement area should be granted
  2. 2 Whether the premises are suitable for the conduct of business under Article 6(9) of the Licensing (Jersey) Law 1974

Ratio Decidendi

The premises were not suitable for the conduct of business as required by Article 6(9) of the Licensing (Jersey) Law 1974 due to safety concerns for pedestrians and the impact on traffic, and therefore the application for extension of the liquor licence was refused.

Court Disposition

application refused