Jersey Monumental Co. (1963) Ltd. v Pirzada [1995] JRC 087 (11 May 1995)
The court found that the respondent breached the contract by failing to perform as required, entitling the applicant to relief.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1995] JRC 087
- Parties
- Applicant: Jersey Monumental Co. (1963) Ltd.; Respondent: Pirzada
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for applicant
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract
Contract Breach of Contract
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Jersey Monumental Co. (1963) Ltd.
Applicant
Pirzada
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent breached contractual obligations owed to the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent breached the contract by failing to perform as required, entitling the applicant to relief.
Court Disposition
judgment for applicant
Orders
- Respondent to pay damages to applicant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment