Jersey Monumental Co. (1963) Ltd. v Pirzada [1995] JRC 087 (11 May 1995)

Jersey Monumental Co. (1963) Ltd. v Pirzada [1995] JRC 087 (11 May 1995)

The court found that the respondent breached the contract by failing to perform as required, entitling the applicant to relief.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1995] JRC 087
Parties
Applicant: Jersey Monumental Co. (1963) Ltd.; Respondent: Pirzada
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
11 May 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for applicant
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract
Contract Breach of Contract

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jersey Monumental Co. (1963) Ltd.

Applicant

Pirzada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent breached contractual obligations owed to the applicant

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent breached the contract by failing to perform as required, entitling the applicant to relief.

Court Disposition

judgment for applicant

Orders

  • Respondent to pay damages to applicant