Tepe Insaat -v- Boru Hatlari lle Petrol Tasima AS and Turkish Petroleum and Botas International [2015] JRC 102 (13 May 2015)
Joining Nacap BV as a party cited in Jersey is equivalent to joining a reluctant joint creditor as a defendant in England; this suffices to bring all necessary parties before the court and enables enforcement of the arbitral award.
- Citation
- [2015] JRC 102
- Parties
- Representor: Tepe; First Respondent: Botas; Second Respondent: Second Respondent; Third Respondent: Third Respondent; Party Cited: Nacap BV
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Re Amend Representation and Join Party Cited / Post Hearing Decision on Joinder and Leave to Serve Out
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Assignment of Contractual Rights, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Service Out of Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tepe
Representor
Botas
First Respondent
Second Respondent
Second Respondent
Third Respondent
Third Respondent
Nacap BV
Party Cited
Procedural Posture
Application to Re Amend Representation and Join Party Cited / Post Hearing Decision on Joinder and Leave to Serve Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Nacap BV should be joined as a party cited to the proceedings
- 2 Whether leave should be granted to serve Nacap BV outside the jurisdiction
- 3 Whether joining a joint creditor as a party cited is sufficient for enforcement of arbitral awards
Ratio Decidendi
Joining Nacap BV as a party cited in Jersey is equivalent to joining a reluctant joint creditor as a defendant in England; this suffices to bring all necessary parties before the court and enables enforcement of the arbitral award.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Leave granted for Tepe to re-amend its representation to join Nacap BV as a party cited.
- Leave granted to serve Nacap BV outside the jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 7 of the Service of Process Rules 1994.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment