In re Northern Rockdrillers Ltd. v [1981] JLR 9 (10 February 1981)
A contractor is not entitled to claim funds in a joint account with a sub-contractor unless it is established that the sub-contractor defaulted in performance before desastre.
- Citation
- [1981] JLR 9
- Parties
- Sub Contractor: Northern Rockdrillers Ltd.; Contractor: [Unnamed Contractor]
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Banking Dispute / Judgment
- Outcome
- Contractor not entitled to funds without proof of sub-contractor default before desastre.
- Legal Topics
- Joint Accounts, Performance Bonds, Sub Contractor Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Northern Rockdrillers Ltd.
Sub Contractor
[Unnamed Contractor]
Contractor
Procedural Posture
Banking Dispute / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether funds in a joint account between a sub-contractor and contractor are equivalent to a performance bond
- 2 Whether the contractor is entitled to claim funds in the joint account without establishing sub-contractor default before desastre
Ratio Decidendi
A contractor is not entitled to claim funds in a joint account with a sub-contractor unless it is established that the sub-contractor defaulted in performance before desastre.
Court Disposition
Contractor not entitled to funds without proof of sub-contractor default before desastre.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment