Scott v Minister for Treasury and Resources and the AG [2020] JCA 115 (18 June 2020)
The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal to the Privy Council from a refusal of leave to appeal, and in any event, no point of law of great or general public importance arises.
- Citation
- [2020] JCA 115
- Parties
- Applicant: Jonathan Tindall Scott; First Respondent: Minister for Treasury and Resources; Second Respondent: Her Majesty's Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council refused for want of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Leave to Appeal, Jurisdiction, Government Schemes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jonathan Tindall Scott
Applicant
Minister for Treasury and Resources
First Respondent
Her Majesty's Attorney General
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal to the Privy Council can be granted from a refusal of leave to appeal by the Court of Appeal
- 2 Whether the decision involves a point of law of great or general public importance
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to grant leave to appeal to the Privy Council from a refusal of leave to appeal, and in any event, no point of law of great or general public importance arises.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council refused for want of jurisdiction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment