AG v Jones McFarland and Pinkowski [2004] JRC 002 (06 January 2004)

AG v Jones McFarland and Pinkowski [2004] JRC 002 (06 January 2004)

Sentences were determined by applying established guidelines to the quantity and nature of drugs involved, the defendants' roles, and relevant mitigating and aggravating factors, resulting in substantial custodial sentences to reflect the seriousness of the offences.

Citation
[2004] JRC 002
Parties
Defendant: Jones; Defendant: McFarland; Defendant: Pinkowski; Prosecution: Crown Advocate
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
06 January 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Outcome
defendants sentenced to terms of imprisonment; drugs forfeited and ordered destroyed
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Mitigation, Concurrent Sentences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jones

Defendant

McFarland

Defendant

Pinkowski

Defendant

Crown Advocate

Prosecution

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing Judgment

  1. 1 Appropriate sentencing for supply and possession with intent to supply Class A drugs
  2. 2 Mitigating and aggravating factors in sentencing for drug offences
  3. 3 Application of sentencing guidelines for drug trafficking

Ratio Decidendi

Sentences were determined by applying established guidelines to the quantity and nature of drugs involved, the defendants' roles, and relevant mitigating and aggravating factors, resulting in substantial custodial sentences to reflect the seriousness of the offences.

Court Disposition

defendants sentenced to terms of imprisonment; drugs forfeited and ordered destroyed

Orders

  • Jones sentenced to 6 years' imprisonment (concurrent sentences on multiple counts)
  • McFarland sentenced to 4 years' imprisonment (concurrent sentences on multiple counts)