Jordan v Att. Gen. [2005] JLR_Note 18 (29 April 2005)
The court determined the criteria for assessing reasonable costs in legal aid cases.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jordan; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Legal Aid Costs Determination / Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs assessed as reasonable under legal aid.
- Legal Topics
- Legal Aid, Reasonable Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jordan
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Legal Aid Costs Determination / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What constitutes reasonable costs under legal aid?
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined the criteria for assessing reasonable costs in legal aid cases.
Court Disposition
Costs assessed as reasonable under legal aid.
Orders
- Costs to be paid as determined by the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Jordan v Att. Gen. [2005] JLR_Note 18 (29 April 2005) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR05N018.html Cite as: [2005] JLR_Note 18 [ New search ] [ Help ] Jordan v Att. Gen. 2005 JLR Note 18 (29 April 2005) Legal Aid-costs-reasonable costs The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2005 JLR Note 18 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR05N018.html