JT Jersey Ltd -v- Wood [2016] JCA 105A (14 June 2016)

The minimal delay, absence of prejudice to the respondent, and the appeal being worthwhile justify granting the extension, despite insufficient explanation for the delay.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2016] JCA 105A
Parties: Appellant: JT (Jersey) Limited; Respondent: Mark Wood
Jurisdiction: Jersey
Judgment Date: 14 June 2016
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Extension of time granted
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Service of Notice of Appeal

Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Service of Notice of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

JT (Jersey) Limited

Appellant

Mark Wood

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether a retrospective extension of time for service of Notice of Appeal should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The minimal delay, absence of prejudice to the respondent, and the appeal being worthwhile justify granting the extension, despite insufficient explanation for the delay.

Court Disposition

Extension of time granted

Orders

Extension of time for service of Notice of Appeal allowed to 25 May 2016
Costs of the application reserved to be dealt with by the Court of Appeal when it decides the appeal

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.