1999/123 - AG v Howell [1999] UR 123 (9 July 1999)
There was nothing in the application to show that the Magistrate's refusal of bail was so unreasonable that no reasonable Magistrate could have made it; therefore, the refusal stands.
- Citation
- [1999] UR 123
- Parties
- Applicant: Kevin Howell; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application Review / Appeal From Magistrate's Decision
- Outcome
- bail refused
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Assault on Police Officer
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Kevin Howell
Applicant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Application Review / Appeal From Magistrate's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Magistrate's refusal of bail was so unreasonable that no reasonable Magistrate could have made it
Ratio Decidendi
There was nothing in the application to show that the Magistrate's refusal of bail was so unreasonable that no reasonable Magistrate could have made it; therefore, the refusal stands.
Court Disposition
bail refused
Orders
- Bail application refused
- Trial fixed for 10 am on 28 July
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment