AG -v- Mooney and Cunningham [2010] JRC 030 (12 February 2010)

AG -v- Mooney and Cunningham [2010] JRC 030 (12 February 2010)

The sentence was reduced from the starting point due to the defendant's guilty plea and the court's view that rehabilitation at Silkworth Lodge should be facilitated as soon as possible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] JRC 030
Parties
Defendant: Kevin Mooney; Co Defendant: Cunningham
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
12 February 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Possession With Intent to Supply, Obstruction of Police, Sentencing, Drug Offences
Criminal Law Possession With Intent to Supply Obstruction of Police Sentencing Drug Offences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kevin Mooney

Defendant

Cunningham

Co Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for possession of cannabis and BZP with intent to supply
  2. 2 Obstruction of police in execution of duty
  3. 3 Consideration of guilty plea and rehabilitation in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence was reduced from the starting point due to the defendant's guilty plea and the court's view that rehabilitation at Silkworth Lodge should be facilitated as soon as possible.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 12 months' imprisonment on Count 1
  • 8 months' imprisonment on Count 2, concurrent