Kramer v Att. Gen. [1992] JLR_Note 10d (16 March 1992)
The court determined that the presence or absence of exceptional circumstances is critical in deciding mitigation for drug possession.
- Parties
- Applicant: Kramer; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment delivered
- Legal Topics
- Drug Possession, Exceptional Circumstances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Kramer
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'exceptional circumstances' exist to mitigate liability for drug possession
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the presence or absence of exceptional circumstances is critical in deciding mitigation for drug possession.
Court Disposition
judgment delivered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment